[Carfreeliving] Extremists?
Mike Sallaberry
Mike.Sallaberry at sfgov.org
Fri Apr 15 13:09:10 MDT 2005
I used to play football/baseball/frisbee in the middle of the street in
the Sunset when I was growing up. The argument could be made that the
streets are to be kept clear of such activities so that they can be used
more easily by people wishing to travel. I'm generally not a fan of
having segregated space for every use or group...there's a natural
fluidity to how space is used.
There's a give and take inherent to city life. If people react strongly
everytime someone else breaks a rule/law, people would constantly be at
each other's throats. The message I was hearing from some folks is that
sidewalks can NEVER be used by motor vehicles or anything other than
cyclists, period. I don't think that's a realistic position to take.
An example on the other end of the spectrum: People who argue strongly
cyclists should come to a complete stop and put their foot down at every
stop sign regardless of the situation/conditions at the time or be
ticketed are extremists in my book too.
To me, nearly all rules and laws are sources of guidance, not something
that should be blindly adhered to. What should rule overall is common
sense, respect, and civility, especially in a city where people are
crammed together and unique situations constantly arise.
And for the record, I've called in my fair share of cars on the sidewalk,
and do not believe they should be used as personal parking spaces.
Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/carfreeliving_livablecity.org/attachments/20050415/63df979c/attachment.htm
More information about the Carfreeliving
mailing list