[Carfreeliving] Treassure Island mass development, green?
Joshua Switzky
Joshua.Switzky at sfgov.org
Mon Dec 19 10:41:24 MST 2005
I think John King hit on an important point: no towers should come close in
height to the Bay Bridge towers. The bridge is one the most important
structures and visual symbols of the bay area, and we shouldn't muddle it
up with other towers in the bay nearby. I'm not a fan of towers in the bay
at all the view from the east bay to SF and vice versa is our postcard view
-- the flat expanse of the bay connected by a grand bridge with a city
rising up dramatically on either side. To stick a bunch of towers in the
middle of that, competing with all the other elements, is just
short-sighted. And in fact, they are not necessary to achieve the density
sought, which could be achieved with a few more 8 story buildings. I lean
more to turning the entire island into a wetland wildlife/bird preserve. I
do like the organic farming idea.
-j
Hitesh Soneji
<koolkwote at yahoo.
com> To
Sent by: carfreeliving at livablecity.org
Carfreeliving-bou cc
nces at livablecity.
org Subject
[Carfreeliving] Treassure Island
mass development, green?
12/16/2005 03:13
PM
Please respond to
hitesh at sonejifami
ly.org
you guys see this?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/12/15/DDG7DG7HVP1.DTL
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Carfreeliving at livablecity.org mailing list
to facilitate and promote car-free living in SF
To unsubscribe:
mailto:Carfreeliving-request at livablecity.org?subject=unsubscribe
or, for all options, go to:
http://livablecity.org/mailman/listinfo/carfreeliving_livablecity.org
More information about the Carfreeliving
mailing list